26 NAD+ sellers publish several prices of one kind

Several figures, all of them the same kind

A price page that shows one number is making one claim. 26 of the 110 sellers read for this index show several, and the interesting part is that they are not showing a range of different sorts of number. A seller that prints “from $99” beside a $249 monthly rate has published two facts of two different kinds, and this site records them as two different kinds. That is not what is happening here.

Every seller below publishes several figures that this index classified identically — 26 of the 26 sets are a single kind throughout. Across the whole group the kinds represented are standing rate, from-price, first period, one-time, prepay total. So the question a reader is left with is not “which of these is the real number” in the sense of one being a floor and one a charge. They are the same sort of number, more than once.

How many sellers, and how many figures each

14 sellers publish 2; 6 sellers publish 3; 4 sellers publish 4; 1 seller publishes 6; 1 seller publishes 8. 9 of the 26 published theirs across more than one page of their own site; the rest printed every one of them on a single page, where a reader meets them together.

On 4 of the 26, the figures in one set do not all sit on the same billing period — so on those, part of what separates the numbers is how often each one is charged, and the index records that. On the other 22 the period is identical across the set.

What the index cannot say about the gap

Every seller that publishes more than one

Why a range is printed and no figure is chosen

Everywhere this site prints a figure for one of these 26 sellers — the board, the seller’s own review page, the price index — it prints the range and not a figure from inside it. That is a deliberate refusal and it is worth stating plainly, because the alternative is easy and looks helpful.

Printing the smaller number would say the seller charges it, which no page read here establishes: it may be a tier a given reader does not qualify for, a dose half the size of the other, or a plan that is no longer sold. Printing the larger one would be worse for the reader and no better supported. Printing an average would invent a figure the seller has never charged anybody. What the seller published is the set, so the set is what this index publishes, and the reader is sent to the seller’s own page to find out which one applies to them.

What this page cannot tell you

This page cannot tell you what the seller calls each of these figures. The package name printed beside the number is the one thing not held here, so two figures from one seller can be seen to differ without anything saying what the seller called each one. It is an open question below rather than a guess, and the only way to close it is to read those pages again.

This table does not measure whether the gap has moved. Its current recorded offers have source readings in September 2026 to October 2026, with each seller’s source period shown beside its range. A range across several offers is different from a change between readings of one offer. Earlier price checks, where retained, are shown on the relevant provider review. The reading record says what that means and what it does not.

Price variation becomes clearer in a full seller record. The ShedRx review separates product formats; the Sprout Health review distinguishes plan and first-period wording; and the PeterMD review records different supply periods. The OurView Health review also distinguishes its $120 product listing from a $130 monthly plan; the lower number has no stated billing period. These are reasons to read the conditions rather than reduce a seller to its smallest number.